Beaton v Devon County Council [2002] EWCA Civ 1675 (31 October 2002)
The County Council did not breach its statutory duty of care as the evidence did not establish that the risk was more than minimal, the gullies were generally properly maintained, and no previous accidents had occurred; the judge misdirected himself by imposing a higher standard of care than required by statute.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1675
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Jennifer Beaton; Appellant/defendant: Devon County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; County Council not liable.
- Legal Topics
- Occupier's Liability, Negligence, Personal Injury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jennifer Beaton
Respondent/claimant
Devon County Council
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Devon County Council breached its duty of care under the Occupier's Liability Act 1957 by failing to maintain the cycle path and gullies in Landcross Tunnel to a reasonable standard
- 2 Whether the lighting and maintenance of the tunnel constituted a hazard to cyclists
- 3 Whether the standard of care imposed was higher than required by statute
Ratio Decidendi
The County Council did not breach its statutory duty of care as the evidence did not establish that the risk was more than minimal, the gullies were generally properly maintained, and no previous accidents had occurred; the judge misdirected himself by imposing a higher standard of care than required by statute.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; County Council not liable.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs to be subject to detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment