Beaton v Devon County Council [2002] EWCA Civ 1675 (31 October 2002)

Beaton v Devon County Council [2002] EWCA Civ 1675 (31 October 2002)

The County Council did not breach its statutory duty of care as the evidence did not establish that the risk was more than minimal, the gullies were generally properly maintained, and no previous accidents had occurred; the judge misdirected himself by imposing a higher standard of care than required by statute.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1675
Parties
Respondent/claimant: Jennifer Beaton; Appellant/defendant: Devon County Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 October 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; County Council not liable.
Legal Topics
Occupier's Liability, Negligence, Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jennifer Beaton

Respondent/claimant

Devon County Council

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Devon County Council breached its duty of care under the Occupier's Liability Act 1957 by failing to maintain the cycle path and gullies in Landcross Tunnel to a reasonable standard
  2. 2 Whether the lighting and maintenance of the tunnel constituted a hazard to cyclists
  3. 3 Whether the standard of care imposed was higher than required by statute

Ratio Decidendi

The County Council did not breach its statutory duty of care as the evidence did not establish that the risk was more than minimal, the gullies were generally properly maintained, and no previous accidents had occurred; the judge misdirected himself by imposing a higher standard of care than required by statute.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; County Council not liable.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs to be subject to detailed assessment.