Pickfords Ltd v Celestica Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1741 (19 November 2003)
The second offer of 27 September 2001 impliedly revoked the first offer of 13 September 2001. The defendant's fax of 15 October 2001 purported to accept the first offer but introduced a cap of £100,000, making it a counter-offer. The claimant accepted this counter-offer by conduct in carrying out the work. The contract was formed on the terms of the first offer as modified by the cap in the acceptance.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1741
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Pickfords Limited; Defendant/respondent: Celestica Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Manchester County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Offer and Acceptance, Revocation of Offer, Formation of Contract, Counter Offer, Incorporation of Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pickfords Limited
Claimant/appellant
Celestica Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Manchester County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second offer revoked the first offer
- 2 Which offer was accepted by the defendant's fax of 15 October 2001
- 3 Whether a contract was formed and on what terms
Ratio Decidendi
The second offer of 27 September 2001 impliedly revoked the first offer of 13 September 2001. The defendant's fax of 15 October 2001 purported to accept the first offer but introduced a cap of £100,000, making it a counter-offer. The claimant accepted this counter-offer by conduct in carrying out the work. The contract was formed on the terms of the first offer as modified by the cap in the acceptance.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs to be subject to detailed assessment.
- Appellants to pay the respondents an interim payment of £6,000 on account.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment