Associated Newspapers Ltd v Murray

Associated Newspapers Ltd v Murray

The inclusion of the word 'dishonest' in the claimant's unilateral statement in open court did not misrepresent the pleaded meaning or cause unfairness to the defendant; it was a fair and ordinary-language summary of 'knowingly false'. The court should not interfere with a claimant's statement in open court unless there is real or substantial unfairness, which was not present here.

Parties
Defendant/appellant: Associated Newspapers Limited; Claimant/respondent: Joanne Kathleen Murray
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (defamation) / Appeal From High Court Order Granting Permission for Unilateral Statement in Open Court After Acceptance of Offer of Amends
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Offer of Amends, Statements in Open Court, Meaning in Defamation, Aggravated Damages, Settlement Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Associated Newspapers Limited

Defendant/appellant

Joanne Kathleen Murray

Claimant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (defamation) / Appeal From High Court Order Granting Permission for Unilateral Statement in Open Court After Acceptance of Offer of Amends

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's unilateral statement in open court could include language not expressly pleaded (specifically the word 'dishonest')
  2. 2 Whether references to aggravation of damages outside the pleaded case could be included in the statement

Ratio Decidendi

The inclusion of the word 'dishonest' in the claimant's unilateral statement in open court did not misrepresent the pleaded meaning or cause unfairness to the defendant; it was a fair and ordinary-language summary of 'knowingly false'. The court should not interfere with a claimant's statement in open court unless there is real or substantial unfairness, which was not present here.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission granted for claimant to read the unilateral statement in open court in the terms approved by the judge