Associated Newspapers Ltd v Murray
The inclusion of the word 'dishonest' in the claimant's unilateral statement in open court did not misrepresent the pleaded meaning or cause unfairness to the defendant; it was a fair and ordinary-language summary of 'knowingly false'. The court should not interfere with a claimant's statement in open court unless there is real or substantial unfairness, which was not present here.
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Associated Newspapers Limited; Claimant/respondent: Joanne Kathleen Murray
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (defamation) / Appeal From High Court Order Granting Permission for Unilateral Statement in Open Court After Acceptance of Offer of Amends
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Offer of Amends, Statements in Open Court, Meaning in Defamation, Aggravated Damages, Settlement Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defendant/appellant
Joanne Kathleen Murray
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (defamation) / Appeal From High Court Order Granting Permission for Unilateral Statement in Open Court After Acceptance of Offer of Amends
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's unilateral statement in open court could include language not expressly pleaded (specifically the word 'dishonest')
- 2 Whether references to aggravation of damages outside the pleaded case could be included in the statement
Ratio Decidendi
The inclusion of the word 'dishonest' in the claimant's unilateral statement in open court did not misrepresent the pleaded meaning or cause unfairness to the defendant; it was a fair and ordinary-language summary of 'knowingly false'. The court should not interfere with a claimant's statement in open court unless there is real or substantial unfairness, which was not present here.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission granted for claimant to read the unilateral statement in open court in the terms approved by the judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment