Mond v Hyde & Anor [1998] EWCA Civ 1226 (16 July 1998)
The Official Receiver, as an officer of the court, is immune from suit for statements made in the course of bankruptcy proceedings, including those made to a trustee in bankruptcy, whether or not the statements are alleged to be negligent. This immunity is grounded in public policy to ensure frankness and the proper administration of justice. The Department of Trade and Industry is not vicariously liable for such statements. The appellant's claim discloses no cause of action and is struck out.
- Citation
- [1998] EWCA Civ 1226
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Mond; Defendant/respondent: Hyde; Defendant/respondent: Department of Trade and Industry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Official Receiver Immunity, Negligent Misstatement, Vicarious Liability, Bankruptcy Proceedings, Public Policy Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mond
Plaintiff/appellant
Hyde
Defendant/respondent
Department of Trade and Industry
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an Official Receiver in Bankruptcy is immune from an action for damages for negligent misstatement made to a trustee in bankruptcy.
- 2 Whether the Department of Trade and Industry is vicariously liable for statements made by the Official Receiver.
- 3 Whether the statements made by the Official Receiver were negligent and caused loss to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi
The Official Receiver, as an officer of the court, is immune from suit for statements made in the course of bankruptcy proceedings, including those made to a trustee in bankruptcy, whether or not the statements are alleged to be negligent. This immunity is grounded in public policy to ensure frankness and the proper administration of justice. The Department of Trade and Industry is not vicariously liable for such statements. The appellant's claim discloses no cause of action and is struck out.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment