Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2024] EWCA Civ 1500 (06 December 2024)

Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2024] EWCA Civ 1500 (06 December 2024)

The amendments to pleadings identifying additional oil spills and illegal refining were further particularisation of the original claims, not new causes of action, as the scope of the original claims included published and unpublished spills and third-party interference. CPR 17.4 was not engaged. The concept of 'global claims' does not apply to environmental torts; the claims should proceed on conventional causation principles. The court erred in refusing to allow selection or trial of lead claims.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Civ 1500
Parties
Claimants/appellants: Alame and Others; Claimants/appellants: Chief Minapakama and Others; Claimants/appellants: Okpabi and Others; Claimants/appellants: Ejire Awala and Others; Claimants/appellants: Okochi Nwoko Ododo and Others; Defendants/respondents: Shell PLC (formerly Royal Dutch Shell PLC); Defendants/respondents: The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (king's Bench Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Defendants' appeal dismissed; Claimants' appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Oil Pollution, Causation, Group Litigation, Amendment of Pleadings, Disclosure, Statutory Duty, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands V Fletcher, Trespass
Environmental Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Oil Pollution Causation Group Litigation Amendment of Pleadings Disclosure +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alame and Others

Claimants/appellants

Chief Minapakama and Others

Claimants/appellants

Okpabi and Others

Claimants/appellants

Ejire Awala and Others

Claimants/appellants

Okochi Nwoko Ododo and Others

Claimants/appellants

Shell PLC (formerly Royal Dutch Shell PLC)

Defendants/respondents

The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd

Defendants/respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal From High Court (king's Bench Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether amendments to pleadings introducing additional oil spills and illegal refining claims constitute new causes of action barred by limitation
  2. 2 Whether the concept of 'global claims' applies to environmental damage litigation
  3. 3 Whether the court should allow selection or trial of lead claims

Ratio Decidendi

The amendments to pleadings identifying additional oil spills and illegal refining were further particularisation of the original claims, not new causes of action, as the scope of the original claims included published and unpublished spills and third-party interference. CPR 17.4 was not engaged. The concept of 'global claims' does not apply to environmental torts; the claims should proceed on conventional causation principles. The court erred in refusing to allow selection or trial of lead claims.

Court Disposition

Defendants' appeal dismissed; Claimants' appeal allowed

Orders

  • Amendments to pleadings (additional spills and illegal refining) permitted
  • Declarations that claims are not to be treated as 'global claims'