Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor

Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor

The Additional Spills and Illegal Refining Amendments did not introduce new causes of action but were further particulars of the original claims, or in the alternative, arose from the same or substantially the same facts as already in issue. The claimants cannot be compelled to proceed as global claims against their will. Case management should proceed by selection of lead cases, with disclosure and further pleadings to ensure fairness and equality of arms.

Parties
Claimants/appellants: Alame and Others; Claimants/appellants: Chief Minapakama and Others; Claimants/appellants: Okpabi and Others; Claimants/appellants: Ejire Awala and Others; Claimants/appellants: Okochi Nwoko Ododo and Others; Defendants/respondents: Shell PLC (formerly known as Royal Dutch Shell PLC); Defendants/respondents: The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (multi Party Environmental Tort) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Interlocutory Appeals From High Court
Outcome
Defendants' appeals dismissed; Claimants' appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Oil Pollution, Group Litigation, Amendment of Pleadings, Causation, Disclosure, Inequality of Arms, Case Management
Environmental Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Oil Pollution Group Litigation Amendment of Pleadings Causation Disclosure +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alame and Others

Claimants/appellants

Chief Minapakama and Others

Claimants/appellants

Okpabi and Others

Claimants/appellants

Ejire Awala and Others

Claimants/appellants

Okochi Nwoko Ododo and Others

Claimants/appellants

Shell PLC (formerly known as Royal Dutch Shell PLC)

Defendants/respondents

The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd

Defendants/respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (multi Party Environmental Tort) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Interlocutory Appeals From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether amendments to pleadings introducing additional oil spills and illegal refining claims constitute new causes of action under CPR 17.4
  2. 2 Whether the claims must be progressed as 'global claims' (all-or-nothing claims)
  3. 3 Whether case management should proceed by selection of lead claimants

Ratio Decidendi

The Additional Spills and Illegal Refining Amendments did not introduce new causes of action but were further particulars of the original claims, or in the alternative, arose from the same or substantially the same facts as already in issue. The claimants cannot be compelled to proceed as global claims against their will. Case management should proceed by selection of lead cases, with disclosure and further pleadings to ensure fairness and equality of arms.

Court Disposition

Defendants' appeals dismissed; Claimants' appeal allowed

Orders

  • Additional Spills and Illegal Refining Amendments permitted
  • Declarations that claims must proceed as global claims set aside