Willford, R (On the Application Of) v Financial Services Authority

Willford, R (On the Application Of) v Financial Services Authority

The court held that anonymisation and redaction of the judgment were not strictly necessary in the interests of justice, as the principle of open justice outweighed the applicant's privacy concerns once the matter entered the public forum through judicial review.

Parties
Applicant/respondent: Christopher Willford; Defendant/appellant: Financial Services Authority
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Decision
Outcome
Application for anonymisation and redaction dismissed.
Legal Topics
Open Justice, Anonymisation of Judgments, Disciplinary Proceedings
Administrative Law Financial Regulation Open Justice Anonymisation of Judgments Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Willford

Applicant/respondent

Financial Services Authority

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judgment should be anonymised and redacted to protect the applicant's identity
  2. 2 Application of the principle of open justice in disciplinary proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that anonymisation and redaction of the judgment were not strictly necessary in the interests of justice, as the principle of open justice outweighed the applicant's privacy concerns once the matter entered the public forum through judicial review.

Court Disposition

Application for anonymisation and redaction dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment to be published in full without anonymisation or redaction.