The Centre for Advice On Individual Rights In Europe v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor

The Centre for Advice On Individual Rights In Europe v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor

Operation Nexus does not breach Article 14(2) of the Citizens' Directive because routine questioning of EEA nationals does not amount to systematic verification; only if reasonable doubt arises is further verification triggered. Police officers lawfully ask such questions, as assisting immigration enforcement is a policing purpose.

Parties
Claimant: The Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Operation Nexus, Citizens' Directive, Police Powers, Right of Residence, Systematic Verification, Article 14(2), Regulation 20 B

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe

Claimant

The Secretary of State for the Home Department

First Defendant

The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing

  1. 1 Whether Operation Nexus breaches Article 14(2) of the Citizens' Directive by systematic verification of EEA nationals' right of residence without reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether police questioning under Operation Nexus is unlawful as not for policing purposes

Ratio Decidendi

Operation Nexus does not breach Article 14(2) of the Citizens' Directive because routine questioning of EEA nationals does not amount to systematic verification; only if reasonable doubt arises is further verification triggered. Police officers lawfully ask such questions, as assisting immigration enforcement is a policing purpose.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed