Gray v Smith & Anor [2022] EWHC 1153 (Ch) (16 May 2022)

Gray v Smith & Anor [2022] EWHC 1153 (Ch) (16 May 2022)

The court found no binding oral contract was concluded between Mr Gray and Mr Smith to jointly build and manage Blackmoor Fund on a 50:50 basis. The evidence supported Mr Smith's account of a non-contractual trial collaboration, contingent on capital raising, with no mutual intention to create legal relations or fiduciary obligations. Mr Gray's claims for breach of contract, fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment failed as the Defendants were not enriched by his contributions and no actionable obligations arose.

Citation
[2022] EWHC 1153 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: James Russell Gray; First Defendant: Douglas Simpson Smith; Second Defendant: Blackmoor Investment Partners Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract and Equity Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Oral Agreements, Fiduciary Duties, Joint Venture, Damages, Equitable Compensation, Quantum Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Russell Gray

Claimant

Douglas Simpson Smith

First Defendant

Blackmoor Investment Partners Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract and Equity Claim / Final Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether a binding oral agreement was concluded between Mr Gray and Mr Smith to jointly build and manage Blackmoor Fund on a 50:50 basis
  2. 2 Whether Mr Smith owed and breached fiduciary duties to Mr Gray
  3. 3 Whether Mr Gray is entitled to damages, equitable compensation, or an account of profits

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no binding oral contract was concluded between Mr Gray and Mr Smith to jointly build and manage Blackmoor Fund on a 50:50 basis. The evidence supported Mr Smith's account of a non-contractual trial collaboration, contingent on capital raising, with no mutual intention to create legal relations or fiduciary obligations. Mr Gray's claims for breach of contract, fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment failed as the Defendants were not enriched by his contributions and no actionable obligations arose.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • All claims by Mr Gray against the Defendants are dismissed.
  • No damages, equitable compensation, or account of profits awarded.