Gray v Smith & Anor [2022] EWHC 1153 (Ch) (16 May 2022)
The court found no binding oral contract was concluded between Mr Gray and Mr Smith to jointly build and manage Blackmoor Fund on a 50:50 basis. The evidence supported Mr Smith's account of a non-contractual trial collaboration, contingent on capital raising, with no mutual intention to create legal relations or fiduciary obligations. Mr Gray's claims for breach of contract, fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment failed as the Defendants were not enriched by his contributions and no actionable obligations arose.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1153 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: James Russell Gray; First Defendant: Douglas Simpson Smith; Second Defendant: Blackmoor Investment Partners Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract and Equity Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Oral Agreements, Fiduciary Duties, Joint Venture, Damages, Equitable Compensation, Quantum Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Russell Gray
Claimant
Douglas Simpson Smith
First Defendant
Blackmoor Investment Partners Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract and Equity Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding oral agreement was concluded between Mr Gray and Mr Smith to jointly build and manage Blackmoor Fund on a 50:50 basis
- 2 Whether Mr Smith owed and breached fiduciary duties to Mr Gray
- 3 Whether Mr Gray is entitled to damages, equitable compensation, or an account of profits
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no binding oral contract was concluded between Mr Gray and Mr Smith to jointly build and manage Blackmoor Fund on a 50:50 basis. The evidence supported Mr Smith's account of a non-contractual trial collaboration, contingent on capital raising, with no mutual intention to create legal relations or fiduciary obligations. Mr Gray's claims for breach of contract, fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment failed as the Defendants were not enriched by his contributions and no actionable obligations arose.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- All claims by Mr Gray against the Defendants are dismissed.
- No damages, equitable compensation, or account of profits awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment