Sukhwinder Singh v Makhan Singh Bains & Anor
The claimant failed to establish, on the balance of probabilities, the existence of the alleged oral agreement entitling him to a shareholding in G B Retail Limited; the evidence was unreliable, inconsistent, and contradictory, and the respondent's account of a profit-sharing arrangement was preferred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sukhwinder Singh; First Defendant: Makhan Singh Bains; Second Defendant: G B Retail Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Oral Agreements, Shareholding Disputes, Partnerships, Specific Performance, Damages, Without Prejudice Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sukhwinder Singh
Claimant
Makhan Singh Bains
First Defendant
G B Retail Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement existed entitling the claimant to a shareholding in G B Retail Limited
- 2 Whether subsequent conduct and evidence can establish the terms of an oral agreement
- 3 Whether without prejudice privilege applies to certain communications
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to establish, on the balance of probabilities, the existence of the alleged oral agreement entitling him to a shareholding in G B Retail Limited; the evidence was unreliable, inconsistent, and contradictory, and the respondent's account of a profit-sharing arrangement was preferred.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for specific performance dismissed
- Claim for damages dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment