JAMES RUSSELL GRAY v DOUGLAS SIMPSON SMITH & Anor

JAMES RUSSELL GRAY v DOUGLAS SIMPSON SMITH & Anor

No binding oral agreement was concluded between the claimant and first defendant to jointly build and manage the fund; the parties' conduct was consistent with a non-contractual trial collaboration, not a contract. There was no fiduciary relationship as the necessary undertaking of responsibility and relationship of trust and confidence were absent. The defendants were not unjustly enriched as the claimant's services did not result in any benefit or enrichment to the defendants. Even if any obligation existed, the claimant failed to prove loss or entitlement to relief.

Parties
Claimant: James Russell Gray; First Defendant: Douglas Simpson Smith; Second Defendant: Blackmoor Investment Partners Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial) / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Oral Contracts, Fiduciary Duties, Joint Ventures, Quantum Meruit, Damages, Account of Profits, Unjust Enrichment, Remedies, Intention to Create Legal Relations
Contract Law Equity Unjust Enrichment Oral Contracts Fiduciary Duties Joint Ventures Quantum Meruit Damages +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Russell Gray

Claimant

Douglas Simpson Smith

First Defendant

Blackmoor Investment Partners Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (commercial) / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an enforceable oral agreement existed between the claimant and first defendant to jointly build and manage an investment fund on a 50:50 basis;
  2. 2 Whether a fiduciary relationship arose between the claimant and first defendant;
  3. 3 Whether the defendants were unjustly enriched by the claimant's services;

Ratio Decidendi

No binding oral agreement was concluded between the claimant and first defendant to jointly build and manage the fund; the parties' conduct was consistent with a non-contractual trial collaboration, not a contract. There was no fiduciary relationship as the necessary undertaking of responsibility and relationship of trust and confidence were absent. The defendants were not unjustly enriched as the claimant's services did not result in any benefit or enrichment to the defendants. Even if any obligation existed, the claimant failed to prove loss or entitlement to relief.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • All claims by the claimant against the defendants are dismissed.
  • The parties are to submit a draft order reflecting the judgment and any consequential matters.