HRH Princess Deema Bint Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud v Ronald William Gibbs & Ors
The Declaration of Trust dated 12 July 2012 is not authentic and was not created in 2012. Mr Gibbs is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the property. There is no basis for a constructive trust or beneficial interest for Mrs Gibbs. The claimant is entitled to an order for sale to enforce the charging order, as the debt is substantial, outstanding for over a year, and no other assets are readily available for enforcement. The property is an investment, not a home, and no third party interests outweigh the creditor's rights.
- Parties
- Claimant: HRH Princess Deema bint Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud; First Defendant: Ronald William Gibbs; Second Defendant: Sandra Dawn Gibbs; Third Defendant: Francesca Danielle Gibbs; Fourth Defendant: Alexander James Gibbs; Fifth Defendant: Saskia Coralie Gibbs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Order for Sale (part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial of Application for Order for Sale
- Outcome
- Order for Sale granted
- Legal Topics
- Order for Sale, Beneficial Ownership, Constructive Trusts, Charging Orders, Enforcement of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HRH Princess Deema bint Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud
Claimant
Ronald William Gibbs
First Defendant
Sandra Dawn Gibbs
Second Defendant
Francesca Danielle Gibbs
Third Defendant
Alexander James Gibbs
Fourth Defendant
Saskia Coralie Gibbs
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Order for Sale (part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial of Application for Order for Sale
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Gibbs owns 36 Kings Road, Richmond, legally and beneficially
- 2 Authenticity of Declaration of Trust dated 12 July 2012
- 3 Whether a constructive trust arises in favour of Mrs Gibbs
Ratio Decidendi
The Declaration of Trust dated 12 July 2012 is not authentic and was not created in 2012. Mr Gibbs is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the property. There is no basis for a constructive trust or beneficial interest for Mrs Gibbs. The claimant is entitled to an order for sale to enforce the charging order, as the debt is substantial, outstanding for over a year, and no other assets are readily available for enforcement. The property is an investment, not a home, and no third party interests outweigh the creditor's rights.
Court Disposition
Order for Sale granted
Orders
- Order for sale of 36 Kings Road, Richmond, Surrey to enforce the charging order
- Directions to be given as to the form of the order and costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment