Kent County Council, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health & Ors
Section 24(5) of the National Assistance Act 1948 only deems ordinary residence for funding purposes when residential accommodation is provided under the Act itself, not when initially provided by the NHS. Kent was therefore responsible for funding NA's accommodation as he was ordinarily resident in Kent when NHS funding ceased.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Kent County Council; Respondent/defendant: Secretary of State for Health; Interested Party: London Borough of Sutton; Interested Party: London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Permission for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ordinary Residence, Local Authority Funding Responsibility, National Assistance Act 1948, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kent County Council
Appellant/claimant
Secretary of State for Health
Respondent/defendant
London Borough of Sutton
Interested Party
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Permission for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 24(5) of the National Assistance Act 1948 deems ordinary residence for funding responsibility when residential accommodation was initially provided by the NHS, not under the 1948 Act
- 2 Proper construction of section 24(5) of the National Assistance Act 1948
Ratio Decidendi
Section 24(5) of the National Assistance Act 1948 only deems ordinary residence for funding purposes when residential accommodation is provided under the Act itself, not when initially provided by the NHS. Kent was therefore responsible for funding NA's accommodation as he was ordinarily resident in Kent when NHS funding ceased.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Judicial review claim dismissed
- Kent County Council remains responsible for funding NA's accommodation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment