F, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2243 (17 September 2010)
On the agreed facts, the two-person rule was not satisfied because the only evidence was that the defendant covered himself whenever anyone other than Mrs Howard was present, so no other person was capable of seeing the act. The judge's ruling was reasonable and should not be overturned.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Crim 2243
- Parties
- Prosecution/applicant: Regina; Defendant/respondent: F
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Prosecution Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Terminating Ruling Under S.58 Criminal Justice Act 2003
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Outraging Public Decency, Two Person Rule, Terminating Ruling, Section 58 Criminal Justice Act 2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution/applicant
F
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Prosecution Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Terminating Ruling Under S.58 Criminal Justice Act 2003
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the two-person rule for outraging public decency was satisfied on the agreed evidence
- 2 Whether the judge's terminating ruling should be overturned
Ratio Decidendi
On the agreed facts, the two-person rule was not satisfied because the only evidence was that the defendant covered himself whenever anyone other than Mrs Howard was present, so no other person was capable of seeing the act. The judge's ruling was reasonable and should not be overturned.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Defendant acquitted of the offence pursuant to section 61(3) Criminal Justice Act 2003
- Representation order to be made if necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment