T v K [2024] EWFC 454 (B) (13 December 2024)
A global psychological assessment was refused as unnecessary and contrary to B's welfare due to delay and lack of evidence of parental manipulation. Parental responsibility was granted to the father based on demonstrated commitment, sufficient attachment, and proper motives, with the welfare checklist supporting the order. No restrictions were placed on the father's exercise of parental responsibility, as there was no evidence of risk or misuse. The mother's address was ordered to be disclosed to the father, with undertakings and safeguards in place. Passports were to be released with an undertaking from the mother to notify the father of travel.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 454 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant Father: T; Respondent Mother: K; Child: B (child, by Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act 1989 Proceedings (parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements, Specific Issue) / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Parental responsibility granted to the father; no order on contact; lives with order for mother; mother's address to be disclosed to father; passports to be released; undertakings accepted.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements Order, Welfare Checklist, Psychological Assessment, Disclosure of Address, Passports, Prohibited Steps Order, Specific Issue Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T
Applicant Father
K
Respondent Mother
B (child, by Guardian)
Child
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Proceedings (parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements, Specific Issue) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to order a global psychological assessment of the family
- 2 Whether to grant the father parental responsibility for B
- 3 Whether to release the mother and B's passports
Ratio Decidendi
A global psychological assessment was refused as unnecessary and contrary to B's welfare due to delay and lack of evidence of parental manipulation. Parental responsibility was granted to the father based on demonstrated commitment, sufficient attachment, and proper motives, with the welfare checklist supporting the order. No restrictions were placed on the father's exercise of parental responsibility, as there was no evidence of risk or misuse. The mother's address was ordered to be disclosed to the father, with undertakings and safeguards in place. Passports were to be released with an undertaking from the mother to notify the father of travel.
Court Disposition
Parental responsibility granted to the father; no order on contact; lives with order for mother; mother's address to be disclosed to father; passports to be released; undertakings accepted.
Orders
- Lives with order in favour of mother
- Parental responsibility order in favour of father
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment