Friends Of The Earth Ltd, R. (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for International Trade Export Credits Guarantee Department (UK Export Finance) ("UKEF") & Anor [2022] EWHC 568 (Admin) (15 March 2022)
The court held that UKEF's decision-making process did not breach public law requirements. UKEF was not under a legal obligation to ensure its support was consistent with the Paris Agreement, nor to quantify Scope 3 emissions, and it had taken climate change impacts and the Paris Agreement into account as relevant considerations. The decision was within the statutory discretion conferred by the 1991 Act, and the process was not irrational or unlawful.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 568 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Friends of the Earth Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for International Trade / Export Credits Guarantee Department (UK Export Finance) (UKEF); Second Defendant: Chancellor of the Exchequer; Interested Party: Total E&P Mozambique Area 1 Limitada; Interested Party: Moz LNG1 Financing Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Paris Agreement Compliance, Export Credit Agency Decision Making, Climate Change Obligations, Scope 3 Emissions, Government Finance and Climate Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Friends of the Earth Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for International Trade / Export Credits Guarantee Department (UK Export Finance) (UKEF)
First Defendant
Chancellor of the Exchequer
Second Defendant
Total E&P Mozambique Area 1 Limitada
Interested Party
Moz LNG1 Financing Company Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether UKEF's decision to provide export finance for the Mozambique LNG project was lawful in light of the UK's obligations under the Paris Agreement
- 2 Whether UKEF failed to take into account relevant considerations, including climate change impacts and Scope 3 emissions, in its decision-making process
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that UKEF's decision-making process did not breach public law requirements. UKEF was not under a legal obligation to ensure its support was consistent with the Paris Agreement, nor to quantify Scope 3 emissions, and it had taken climate change impacts and the Paris Agreement into account as relevant considerations. The decision was within the statutory discretion conferred by the 1991 Act, and the process was not irrational or unlawful.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review refused
- No order quashing the UKEF decision or related approvals
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment