Johnson, R (On the Application Of) v Parole Board for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 1026 (Admin) (04 May 2022)
The Parole Board is functus officio after fixing a release date under section 256(1)(a) Criminal Justice Act 2003; it has no statutory power to re-fix the date, as the statutory scheme and rules indicate finality once the Board determines the reference by fixing a date. Section 12(1) Interpretation Act 1978 does not imply a continuity of power in this context, as contrary intention appears from the statutory provisions and rules.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1026 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Audi Johnson; First Defendant: Parole Board for England and Wales; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Parole Board Powers, Functus Officio, Release on Licence, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Audi Johnson
Claimant
Parole Board for England and Wales
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Justice
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Parole Board have power to re-fix a release date after fixing it under section 256(1)(a) Criminal Justice Act 2003?
- 2 Is the Board functus officio after fixing a release date?
- 3 Does section 12(1) Interpretation Act 1978 imply a continuity of power for the Board to revisit release dates?
Ratio Decidendi
The Parole Board is functus officio after fixing a release date under section 256(1)(a) Criminal Justice Act 2003; it has no statutory power to re-fix the date, as the statutory scheme and rules indicate finality once the Board determines the reference by fixing a date. Section 12(1) Interpretation Act 1978 does not imply a continuity of power in this context, as contrary intention appears from the statutory provisions and rules.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration that the Parole Board had no power to re-fix the release date after fixing it under section 256(1)(a) Criminal Justice Act 2003
- Further directions to be given if claimant successful
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment