Raggett v The Governors of Preston Catholic College [2012] EWHC 3641 (QB) (21 December 2012)
The claimant and his advisers had sufficient information at the time of the Part 36 offer to assess the risks and value of the claim. There is no injustice in applying the usual costs rule under CPR 36.14, requiring the claimant to pay the defendants' costs from the expiry of the offer period.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3641 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Patrick Joseph Raggett; Defendants: The Governors of Preston Catholic College
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (personal Injury/abuse) / Post Trial, Costs and Quantum Determination
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded damages; costs orders made in favour of both parties for different periods; interim payment ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Part 36 Offers, Costs Orders, Quantum of Damages, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Joseph Raggett
Claimant
The Governors of Preston Catholic College
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil (personal Injury/abuse) / Post Trial, Costs and Quantum Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should pay the defendants' costs from the date of expiry of the Part 36 offer
- 2 Whether any special order should be made regarding the costs of Professor Zeitlin's evidence
- 3 Whether set off of damages and costs is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant and his advisers had sufficient information at the time of the Part 36 offer to assess the risks and value of the claim. There is no injustice in applying the usual costs rule under CPR 36.14, requiring the claimant to pay the defendants' costs from the expiry of the offer period.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded damages; costs orders made in favour of both parties for different periods; interim payment ordered.
Orders
- Defendants to pay claimant damages of £54,923.03 inclusive of interest.
- Defendants to pay claimant's costs incurred up to and including 25 June 2009, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment