Scammell & Ors v Dicker [2000] EWCA Civ 352 (21 December 2000)
The Civil Procedure Rules do not prevent a Part 36 offer being withdrawn at any time prior to acceptance. The appellant's Part 36 offer was validly withdrawn before acceptance, so the respondents' purported acceptance did not result in a compromise of the action.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 352
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Mrs Dicker; Respondents/claimants: Respondents (neighbouring landowners in Dorset)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of His Honour Judge Thompson QC Dated 20 March 2000
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Part 36 Offers, Withdrawal of Settlement Offers, Contract Law Principles in Settlement, Costs Consequences of Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Dicker
Appellant/defendant
Respondents (neighbouring landowners in Dorset)
Respondents/claimants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of His Honour Judge Thompson QC Dated 20 March 2000
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Part 36 offer can be withdrawn prior to acceptance even if expressed to remain open for a specified period
- 2 Whether the action was compromised by acceptance of a withdrawn Part 36 offer
Ratio Decidendi
The Civil Procedure Rules do not prevent a Part 36 offer being withdrawn at any time prior to acceptance. The appellant's Part 36 offer was validly withdrawn before acceptance, so the respondents' purported acceptance did not result in a compromise of the action.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Paragraph 1 of the order of His Honour Judge Thompson QC dated 20 March 2000 set aside
- Paragraphs 2-4 inclusive of the order set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment