J P Finnegan v Spiers (t/a Frank Spiers Licensed Conveyancers) [2018] EWHC 3064 (Ch) (27 June 2018)
Where a Part 36 offer is accepted and a deemed costs order arises under CPR 44.9(1), the court does not have power under CPR 44.2(8) to order a payment on account of costs, as Part 36 is a complete code and does not provide for such a power.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3064 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: J P Finnegan; Defendant/respondent: Frank Spiers t/a Frank Spiers Licensed Conveyancers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge Kelly's Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Part 36 Offers, Interim Payment on Account of Costs, Deemed Costs Orders, Court's Discretion as to Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J P Finnegan
Claimant/appellant
Frank Spiers t/a Frank Spiers Licensed Conveyancers
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge Kelly's Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to order a payment on account of costs where a Part 36 offer has been accepted and a deemed costs order arises under CPR 44.9(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Where a Part 36 offer is accepted and a deemed costs order arises under CPR 44.9(1), the court does not have power under CPR 44.2(8) to order a payment on account of costs, as Part 36 is a complete code and does not provide for such a power.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order for payment on account of costs following acceptance of Part 36 offer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment