Walker Residential Ltd. v Davis & Anor
The claimant, having accepted the Part 36 payment without needing the court’s permission, was entitled as of right to its costs up to the date of acceptance under CPR 36.13(1), and a deemed costs order arose under CPR 44.12(1)(b). The Deputy Master’s subsequent extension of time for the Part 36 payment could not retrospectively deprive the claimant of this entitlement or set aside the deemed order. The court had no jurisdiction to vary or revoke the deemed costs order in these circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: Walker Residential Limited; Defendants: Davis & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (costs Order) / Appeal From Deputy Master’s Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Deputy Master’s costs order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Part 36 Offers and Payments, Costs Consequences of Settlement, Court’s Discretion to Extend Time, Deemed Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walker Residential Limited
Claimant
Davis & Anr
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (costs Order) / Appeal From Deputy Master’s Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was entitled as of right to its costs under CPR 36.13(1) after accepting a Part 36 payment
- 2 Whether the court had jurisdiction to retrospectively deprive the claimant of the deemed costs order by extending time for a Part 36 payment under CPR 3.1(2)(a)
- 3 Whether the Deputy Master could set aside or vary the deemed costs order under CPR 3.1(7) or inherent jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant, having accepted the Part 36 payment without needing the court’s permission, was entitled as of right to its costs up to the date of acceptance under CPR 36.13(1), and a deemed costs order arose under CPR 44.12(1)(b). The Deputy Master’s subsequent extension of time for the Part 36 payment could not retrospectively deprive the claimant of this entitlement or set aside the deemed order. The court had no jurisdiction to vary or revoke the deemed costs order in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Deputy Master’s costs order set aside.
Orders
- Claimant entitled to its costs of the claim up to 31 March 2005 (date of acceptance of Part 36 payment)
- Deemed costs order in claimant’s favour stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment