Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 756 (Ch) (30 March 2020)
The court declined to issue an interim judgment on the objections to the Scheme, holding that the ultimate question of sanction must be determined by reference to the circumstances as they exist at the adjourned hearing, particularly given the uncertainty caused by COVID-19.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 756 (Ch)
- Parties
- Transferor: Legal and General Assurance Society Limited; Transferee: ReAssure Limited; Regulator: Financial Conduct Authority; Regulator: Prudential Regulation Authority; Policyholder Objector: Mr John Gorrod; Policyholder Objector: Mrs Susan Mulholland; Policyholder Objector: Dr Kerry Platman; Policyholder Objector: Ms Tamara Schillinger; Policyholder Objector: Mr Joseph Sebastian; Policyholder Objector: Mr Eugene Nathan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Part VII Insurance Business Transfer Application / Sanction Hearing Adjourned
- Outcome
- Application adjourned; no sanction granted at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Part VII Transfer, Scheme Sanction, COVID 19 Operational Impact, Policyholder Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Legal and General Assurance Society Limited
Transferor
ReAssure Limited
Transferee
Financial Conduct Authority
Regulator
Prudential Regulation Authority
Regulator
Mr John Gorrod
Policyholder Objector
Mrs Susan Mulholland
Policyholder Objector
Dr Kerry Platman
Policyholder Objector
Ms Tamara Schillinger
Policyholder Objector
Mr Joseph Sebastian
Policyholder Objector
Mr Eugene Nathan
Policyholder Objector
Procedural Posture
Part VII Insurance Business Transfer Application / Sanction Hearing Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scheme should be sanctioned under Part VII FSMA
- 2 Impact of COVID-19 on operational feasibility and policyholder interests
- 3 Appropriateness of issuing interim judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to issue an interim judgment on the objections to the Scheme, holding that the ultimate question of sanction must be determined by reference to the circumstances as they exist at the adjourned hearing, particularly given the uncertainty caused by COVID-19.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned; no sanction granted at this stage.
Orders
- Matter reserved to Mr Justice Zacaroli for adjourned hearing.
- No interim judgment issued on Scheme objections.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment