Mariampillai v Sooben [2025] EWHC 394 (Ch) (25 February 2025)
The trial judge's errors regarding SRA notification and partnership status did not undermine the core factual finding that no September variation occurred and the solicitors remained equal equity partners; procedural irregularity did not render the trial unjust.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 394 (Ch)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: David Thayaparan Mariampillai; Respondent/claimant: Anbananden Sooben
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Partnership Agreement, Variation of Partnership Terms, Solicitors Regulation Authority Compliance, Fact Finding on Partnership Status, Procedural Fairness in Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Thayaparan Mariampillai
Appellant/defendant
Anbananden Sooben
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a September 2014 variation altered the partnership agreement
- 2 Whether Mr Sooben ceased to be an equity partner under the alleged 100% agreement
- 3 Whether procedural irregularity rendered the trial unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's errors regarding SRA notification and partnership status did not undermine the core factual finding that no September variation occurred and the solicitors remained equal equity partners; procedural irregularity did not render the trial unjust.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No retrial ordered
- Original judgment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment