Holden v Holden & Anor [2023] EWHC 3292 (Ch) (20 December 2023)

Holden v Holden & Anor [2023] EWHC 3292 (Ch) (20 December 2023)

The partnership was a partnership at will governed by the Meeting Note and the Partnership Act 1890; the 1990 Draft Deed was never agreed or adopted by all partners, and conduct was compatible with continuation under the original terms. The dissolution provisions in the 1990 Draft Deed were not accepted by Robin, and no enforceable variation was established.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 3292 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Robin Steve Harry Holden; First Defendant: David Andrew Holden; Second Defendant: Nicholas Charles Holden
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Partnership Dissolution Claim / Trial Judgment on Preliminary Issues as to Liability
Outcome
Declaration granted that the partnership was a partnership at will governed by the Meeting Note and the Partnership Act 1890; claimant not bound by the 1990 Draft Deed.
Legal Topics
Partnership at Will, Governing Terms of Partnership, Variation of Partnership Agreement, Reopening Partnership Accounts
Partnership Law Contract Law Property Law Partnership at Will Governing Terms of Partnership Variation of Partnership Agreement Reopening Partnership Accounts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robin Steve Harry Holden

Claimant

David Andrew Holden

First Defendant

Nicholas Charles Holden

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Partnership Dissolution Claim / Trial Judgment on Preliminary Issues as to Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the partnership was a partnership at will governed by the Partnership Act 1890 or by the unsigned 1990 Draft Deed
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to an amendment of the partnership revenue accounts or bound by existing accounts

Ratio Decidendi

The partnership was a partnership at will governed by the Meeting Note and the Partnership Act 1890; the 1990 Draft Deed was never agreed or adopted by all partners, and conduct was compatible with continuation under the original terms. The dissolution provisions in the 1990 Draft Deed were not accepted by Robin, and no enforceable variation was established.

Court Disposition

Declaration granted that the partnership was a partnership at will governed by the Meeting Note and the Partnership Act 1890; claimant not bound by the 1990 Draft Deed.

Orders

  • Partnership declared to be at will under the Partnership Act 1890 and Meeting Note.
  • Claimant not bound by the unsigned 1990 Draft Deed.