Pickard & Anor (t/a Jacksons) v Orpwood [2002] EWCA Civ 1392 (5 September 2002)
Permission to appeal is granted on the issue of whether losses from the Worthing office should be included in the calculation of net profits for the purpose of valuing the applicant's share of goodwill, as this may have significantly affected the outcome and costs order. The judge was entitled to construe the partnership deed so that the applicant's share of goodwill reflected his actual period as partner. Other grounds for appeal, including disclosure of financial information and redrawing accounts for alleged mismanagement, do not have sufficient prospects of success.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1392
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Gary Pickard & Another (trading as Jacksons); Defendant/applicant: Phillip Orpwood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Partnership Dissolution, Goodwill Valuation, Capital Account Settlement, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Pickard & Another (trading as Jacksons)
Claimants/respondents
Phillip Orpwood
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the correct method was used to value the outgoing partner's share of goodwill under the partnership deed
- 2 Whether losses from a separate partnership (Worthing office) should be included in the calculation of net profits for goodwill valuation
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to disclosure of supporting financial information
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the issue of whether losses from the Worthing office should be included in the calculation of net profits for the purpose of valuing the applicant's share of goodwill, as this may have significantly affected the outcome and costs order. The judge was entitled to construe the partnership deed so that the applicant's share of goodwill reflected his actual period as partner. Other grounds for appeal, including disclosure of financial information and redrawing accounts for alleged mismanagement, do not have sufficient prospects of success.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted in part
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted on paragraphs 7 and 10 of the judge's order
- Stay of execution pending appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment