Cleopatra Seafoods Ltd v Khera & Ors [2002] EWCA Civ 1260 (23 July 2002)

Cleopatra Seafoods Ltd v Khera & Ors [2002] EWCA Civ 1260 (23 July 2002)

The undertakings given by the defendants in August-September 1999, as evidenced by the 2nd August 1999 letter, settled the claimant's claim for damages for past passing off. The reservation clause only preserved the right to sue for damages or other remedies if the defendants were subsequently involved in similar activities. The prior demands in the 5th July letter were not surviving terms of the agreement.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1260
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Cleopatra Seafoods Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Mr Sukhjinder Singh Khera; Defendant/respondent: KTC (Edibles) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Indus Foods Limited; Defendant/respondent: Mr Sajjid Ali trading as Azim Trading Company; Defendant/respondent: Mr Azim Ali trading as Azim Trading Company
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court, Preliminary Issue
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Compromise and Settlement, Interpretation of Undertakings
Intellectual Property Contract Passing Off Compromise and Settlement Interpretation of Undertakings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cleopatra Seafoods Ltd

Claimant/appellant

Mr Sukhjinder Singh Khera

Defendant/respondent

KTC (Edibles) Limited

Defendant/respondent

Indus Foods Limited

Defendant/respondent

Mr Sajjid Ali trading as Azim Trading Company

Defendant/respondent

Mr Azim Ali trading as Azim Trading Company

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court, Preliminary Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's claim for damages was compromised by undertakings exchanged in August-September 1999
  2. 2 Proper construction of reservation clause in settlement correspondence

Ratio Decidendi

The undertakings given by the defendants in August-September 1999, as evidenced by the 2nd August 1999 letter, settled the claimant's claim for damages for past passing off. The reservation clause only preserved the right to sue for damages or other remedies if the defendants were subsequently involved in similar activities. The prior demands in the 5th July letter were not surviving terms of the agreement.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant's claim against first to third defendants dismissed
  • Claimant ordered to pay costs of first to third defendants