Woolley & Anor v Ultimate Products Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1038 (26 July 2012)
The judge was entitled to find that the appellants' use of the name HENLEYS for watches constituted a misrepresentation likely to deceive a substantial number of purchasers into believing the watches were those of the respondents, and that this misrepresentation caused likely loss of sales to the respondents, thus satisfying the requirements for passing off.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 1038
- Parties
- Respondents: Woolley & Anr; Appellants: Ultimate Products Ltd & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Trademark Infringement, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Woolley & Anr
Respondents
Ultimate Products Ltd & Anr
Appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants' use of the name HENLEYS for watches constituted passing off against the respondents' HENLEY watches
- 2 Whether the requirements of misrepresentation and damage were satisfied for the tort of passing off
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find that the appellants' use of the name HENLEYS for watches constituted a misrepresentation likely to deceive a substantial number of purchasers into believing the watches were those of the respondents, and that this misrepresentation caused likely loss of sales to the respondents, thus satisfying the requirements for passing off.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the order of the High Court stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment