Turbo-K Ltd v Turbo-K International Ltd
TKL had established substantial goodwill in the 'Turbo-K' name and logo prior to TKIL’s incorporation and registration of the mark. TKIL’s use and registration of the mark constituted passing off and was made in bad faith, as TKIL’s directors were aware of TKL’s rights and acted contrary to acceptable commercial standards. Mr Roselli, as an active participant and director, was personally liable for acts of passing off. TKIL’s UK trade mark was invalid under s.5(4)(a) and s.3(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1994. TKIL’s counterclaims for infringement failed as the registration was invalid.
- Parties
- Claimant/part 20 Defendant: Turbo-K Limited; First Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Turbo-K International Limited; Fourth Defendant: Rony Roselli; Fourth Party: Oliver Harald Platz
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- TKL’s claims for passing off and invalidity of TKIL’s UK trade mark succeed. Mr Roselli is personally liable for passing off. TKIL’s counterclaims are dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Trade Mark Invalidity, Bad Faith Registration, Personal Liability of Directors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Turbo-K Limited
Claimant/part 20 Defendant
Turbo-K International Limited
First Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Rony Roselli
Fourth Defendant
Oliver Harald Platz
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TKIL is liable to TKL for passing off
- 2 Whether TKIL’s UK trade mark is invalid due to TKL’s prior rights and/or bad faith
- 3 Whether Mr Roselli is personally liable for TKIL’s acts of passing off
Ratio Decidendi
TKL had established substantial goodwill in the 'Turbo-K' name and logo prior to TKIL’s incorporation and registration of the mark. TKIL’s use and registration of the mark constituted passing off and was made in bad faith, as TKIL’s directors were aware of TKL’s rights and acted contrary to acceptable commercial standards. Mr Roselli, as an active participant and director, was personally liable for acts of passing off. TKIL’s UK trade mark was invalid under s.5(4)(a) and s.3(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1994. TKIL’s counterclaims for infringement failed as the registration was invalid.
Court Disposition
TKL’s claims for passing off and invalidity of TKIL’s UK trade mark succeed. Mr Roselli is personally liable for passing off. TKIL’s counterclaims are dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that TKIL is liable for passing off against TKL
- Declaration that Mr Roselli is personally liable for passing off
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment