Lumos Skincare Ltd v Sweet Squared Ltd & Ors
The Second Defendant is liable to account for profits accrued from supply to First and Third Defendants under a common design for passing off in the UK; only UK sales are relevant for passing off; Defendants may deduct direct costs and specific advertising/freight expenses, but not general overheads or trade show/catalogue costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lumos Skincare Limited; First Defendant: Sweet Squared Limited; Second Defendant: Famous Names LLC; Third Defendant: Sweet Squared (UK) LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Passing Off Action / Account of Profits After Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Account of profits granted; Defendants jointly and severally liable for specified sums.
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Account of Profits, Joint Liability, Goodwill, Deduction of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lumos Skincare Limited
Claimant
Sweet Squared Limited
First Defendant
Famous Names LLC
Second Defendant
Sweet Squared (UK) LLP
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Passing Off Action / Account of Profits After Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the Second Defendant liable to account for profits from supply to First and Third Defendants?
- 2 What was the total revenue derived by the First and Third Defendants from UK sales?
- 3 What was the total revenue derived by the Second Defendant from supply to First and Third Defendants?
Ratio Decidendi
The Second Defendant is liable to account for profits accrued from supply to First and Third Defendants under a common design for passing off in the UK; only UK sales are relevant for passing off; Defendants may deduct direct costs and specific advertising/freight expenses, but not general overheads or trade show/catalogue costs.
Court Disposition
Account of profits granted; Defendants jointly and severally liable for specified sums.
Orders
- First and Third Defendants to pay £24,461.48 to Claimant.
- Second Defendant to pay £17,842.66 to Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment