E-Data Corporation v Getty Images Inc & Anor [2005] EWHC B2 (Pat) (08 June 2005)
The patent claims, properly construed, require that the information manufacturing machine is constructed to reproduce information in material objects at a point of sale location only with the owner's authorization, as manifested by an authorization code. The claims do not extend to systems where further unauthorized copies can be made after initial authorization. The Defendants' construction is correct, and the patent does not cover general purpose computers or locations where there is no sale of material objects embodying information. The patent is not infringed by the Defendants' activities and is invalid on the grounds advanced.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC B2 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: E-Data; Defendants: Getty Images, Inc. and Getty Images (UK) Ltd; Defendants: Corbis Corporation and Corbis U.K. Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Revocation / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; counterclaim for revocation succeeds
- Legal Topics
- Patent Infringement, Patent Revocation, Claim Construction, Supply Chain Security, Point of Sale Technology
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E-Data
Claimant
Getty Images, Inc. and Getty Images (UK) Ltd
Defendants
Corbis Corporation and Corbis U.K. Ltd
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Revocation / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendants infringed European Patent (UK) No. 0 195 098
- 2 Whether the Patent is valid or should be revoked
- 3 Proper construction of key claim terms (e.g., 'information manufacturing machine', 'point of sale location')
Ratio Decidendi
The patent claims, properly construed, require that the information manufacturing machine is constructed to reproduce information in material objects at a point of sale location only with the owner's authorization, as manifested by an authorization code. The claims do not extend to systems where further unauthorized copies can be made after initial authorization. The Defendants' construction is correct, and the patent does not cover general purpose computers or locations where there is no sale of material objects embodying information. The patent is not infringed by the Defendants' activities and is invalid on the grounds advanced.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; counterclaim for revocation succeeds
Orders
- Patent not infringed by Defendants
- Patent revoked
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment