Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 1021 (30 July 2004)
'Free of play' in the patent claim means free of play for practical purposes, i.e., no visible gaps or movement that matters commercially, not absolute absence of movement. The priority document disclosed the invention sufficiently to support the claim without the lip-length and thickness limitations, so the claim is entitled to priority. The defendants' products, described as having no gaps and manufactured to tight tolerances, infringe the patent as construed.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1021
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Unilin Beheer BV; Appellant/defendant: Berry Floor NV; Appellant/defendant: Information Management Consultancy Design Limited (t/a Responsive Designs); Appellant/defendant: B&Q plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Validity Appeal / Appeal From Patents County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Patent Infringement, Patent Validity, Claim Construction, Priority Date, European Patent Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unilin Beheer BV
Respondent/claimant
Berry Floor NV
Appellant/defendant
Information Management Consultancy Design Limited (t/a Responsive Designs)
Appellant/defendant
B&Q plc
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity Appeal / Appeal From Patents County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of 'free of play' in patent claim
- 2 Whether defendants' flooring products infringe the patent as construed
- 3 Whether claim 20 is entitled to the claimed priority date
Ratio Decidendi
'Free of play' in the patent claim means free of play for practical purposes, i.e., no visible gaps or movement that matters commercially, not absolute absence of movement. The priority document disclosed the invention sufficiently to support the claim without the lip-length and thickness limitations, so the claim is entitled to priority. The defendants' products, described as having no gaps and manufactured to tight tolerances, infringe the patent as construed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the patent as amended is valid and infringed by the defendants' products.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment