Ablaise Ltd v Nettec Plc & Anor
The pleadings as they stand are insufficient to make out a case of joint tortfeasance against the first defendant. However, since the claimant has filed evidence that may support such a case, the court will strike out paragraph 6 of the particulars of claim unless the claimant provides further particulars by a specified date.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ablaise Limited; First Defendant: Nettec Plc; Second Defendant: Nettec Solutions Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Claim Against First Defendant
- Outcome
- Conditional striking out of pleading
- Legal Topics
- Patent Infringement, Joint Tortfeasance, Pleading Requirements, Striking Out Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ablaise Limited
Claimant
Nettec Plc
First Defendant
Nettec Solutions Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Claim Against First Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pleadings disclose a sufficient case of joint tortfeasance against the first defendant
- 2 Whether paragraph 6 of the particulars of claim should be struck out for lack of particulars
Ratio Decidendi
The pleadings as they stand are insufficient to make out a case of joint tortfeasance against the first defendant. However, since the claimant has filed evidence that may support such a case, the court will strike out paragraph 6 of the particulars of claim unless the claimant provides further particulars by a specified date.
Court Disposition
Conditional striking out of pleading
Orders
- Paragraph 6 of the particulars of claim to be struck out unless the claimant provides further particulars of joint tortfeasance by 4pm on Friday 14 November 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment