Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors. v Apple Retail UK Limited & Ors.
The terms 'counting', 'resetting', and 'when' in the claims are construed as referring to counter-based mechanisms, discrete resetting steps, and immediate action upon threshold, respectively. Window-based mechanisms do not fall within the scope of the claims. Therefore, the claims are novel over the InterDigital prior art.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors; Appellant/defendant: Apple Retail UK Limited & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Validity Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Novelty, Claim Construction, Anticipation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors
Respondent/claimant
Apple Retail UK Limited & Ors
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claims 1, 6, and 9 of European Patent (UK) No. 2 229 744 B1 are anticipated by InterDigital prior art
- 2 Proper construction of 'counting', 'resetting', and 'when' in the patent claims
Ratio Decidendi
The terms 'counting', 'resetting', and 'when' in the claims are construed as referring to counter-based mechanisms, discrete resetting steps, and immediate action upon threshold, respectively. Window-based mechanisms do not fall within the scope of the claims. Therefore, the claims are novel over the InterDigital prior art.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claims 1, 6, and 9 of European Patent (UK) No. 2 229 744 B1 are novel over InterDigital prior art
- No anticipation found
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment