JJ, R (on the application of) v Spectrum Community Health CIC

JJ, R (on the application of) v Spectrum Community Health CIC

A capacitated patient cannot compel clinicians to provide treatment (feeding non-soft foods) that is not clinically indicated and is considered unsafe by medical professionals. The refusal to provide such treatment is lawful, supported by clinical evidence, and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR. There is no common law or statutory right to demand treatment not offered by clinicians, and staff would be at real risk of regulatory or criminal proceedings if they complied.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: JJ; Defendant/respondent: Spectrum Community Health CIC; Intervener: The Royal College of Physicians
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Patient Autonomy, Medical Treatment Refusal, Article 8 ECHR, Clinical Judgment, Regulatory Risk, Gross Negligence Manslaughter
Medical Law Human Rights Law Administrative Law Patient Autonomy Medical Treatment Refusal Article 8 ECHR Clinical Judgment Regulatory Risk +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JJ

Claimant/appellant

Spectrum Community Health CIC

Defendant/respondent

The Royal College of Physicians

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a medical professional can lawfully refuse to provide treatment (feeding non-prescribed foods) requested by a capacitated patient when it is clinically contraindicated and poses significant risk.
  2. 2 Whether a patient with capacity can demand treatment not clinically indicated and not offered by clinicians.
  3. 3 Whether the refusal to provide such treatment is a proportionate interference with Article 8 ECHR rights.

Ratio Decidendi

A capacitated patient cannot compel clinicians to provide treatment (feeding non-soft foods) that is not clinically indicated and is considered unsafe by medical professionals. The refusal to provide such treatment is lawful, supported by clinical evidence, and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR. There is no common law or statutory right to demand treatment not offered by clinicians, and staff would be at real risk of regulatory or criminal proceedings if they complied.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed on both common law and Article 8 ECHR grounds.