British Bankers Association, R (on the application of) v The Financial Services Authority & Anor

British Bankers Association, R (on the application of) v The Financial Services Authority & Anor

The court held that s150(2) FSMA only excludes a private right of action for breach of Principles but does not prevent the FSA or FOS from relying on Principles in complaint handling or Ombudsman decisions. The Principles remain an overarching regulatory framework and can supplement specific rules unless there is direct conflict. The FSA's approach to root cause analysis and redress is a lawful extension of existing powers and does not amount to an unlawful circumvention of s404. The challenges to the Policy Statement and related guidance are dismissed.

Parties
Claimant: British Bankers Association; First Defendant: Financial Services Authority; Second Defendant: Financial Ombudsman Service; Interested Party: Nemo Personal Finance Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Payment Protection Insurance (ppi), Regulatory Powers, Ombudsman Scheme, Statutory Interpretation, Consumer Protection
Financial Regulation Administrative Law Payment Protection Insurance (ppi) Regulatory Powers Ombudsman Scheme Statutory Interpretation Consumer Protection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

British Bankers Association

Claimant

Financial Services Authority

First Defendant

Financial Ombudsman Service

Second Defendant

Nemo Personal Finance Ltd

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the FSA's Policy Statement 10/12 unlawfully treats non-actionable Principles as creating obligations to customers leading to compensation
  2. 2 Whether the FSA and FOS can lawfully use Principles to augment or contradict specific rules in the Handbook
  3. 3 Whether the FSA's approach unlawfully circumvents the statutory s404 scheme for redress

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that s150(2) FSMA only excludes a private right of action for breach of Principles but does not prevent the FSA or FOS from relying on Principles in complaint handling or Ombudsman decisions. The Principles remain an overarching regulatory framework and can supplement specific rules unless there is direct conflict. The FSA's approach to root cause analysis and redress is a lawful extension of existing powers and does not amount to an unlawful circumvention of s404. The challenges to the Policy Statement and related guidance are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed