L & Ors v M Ltd
Regulation 2(2) of the Entry Rules applies only to legally enforceable agreements that reduce the amount of a debt actually due at the time of the agreement, not to agreements affecting debts that may arise in the future; the Pension Proposal does not render the Scheme ineligible for entry into the Pension Protection Fund.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: L & ORS; Defendant/appellant: M LIMITED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted; Pension Proposal does not render the Scheme ineligible for entry into the Pension Protection Fund.
- Legal Topics
- Pension Protection Fund Eligibility, Employer Debt Apportionment, Statutory Interpretation, Compromise of Pension Debts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L & ORS
Claimant/respondent
M LIMITED
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of Regulation 2(2) of the Pension Protection Fund (Entry Rules) Regulation 205
- 2 Whether the Pension Proposal renders the Scheme ineligible for entry into the Pension Protection Fund
- 3 Temporal scope of 'debt due' under section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 2(2) of the Entry Rules applies only to legally enforceable agreements that reduce the amount of a debt actually due at the time of the agreement, not to agreements affecting debts that may arise in the future; the Pension Proposal does not render the Scheme ineligible for entry into the Pension Protection Fund.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted; Pension Proposal does not render the Scheme ineligible for entry into the Pension Protection Fund.
Orders
- Declarations to be made accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment