IMG Pension Plan HR Trustees Ltd v German & Anor [2009] EWHC 2785 (Ch) (10 November 2009)
The 1992 Deed did not validly convert the Plan from a defined benefit to a defined contribution scheme in respect of accrued rights because the power of amendment was not properly exercised and did not permit the removal of accrued defined benefit entitlements. The compromise agreements did not operate to waive accrued defined benefit rights for members who did not give informed consent. Estoppel and contract arguments failed due to lack of clear representation or agreement by members to forgo accrued rights.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 2785 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: IMG Pension Plan HR Trustees Limited; First Defendant: Peter German; Second Defendant: International Management Group (UK) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Part 8 Claim / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief granted; conversion invalid as to accrued rights; compromise agreements not effective to waive accrued rights without informed consent.
- Legal Topics
- Pension Scheme Conversion, Trustee Duties, Power of Amendment, Compromise Agreements, Estoppel, Contractual Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IMG Pension Plan HR Trustees Limited
Claimant
Peter German
First Defendant
International Management Group (UK) Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Part 8 Claim / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1992 Deed validly converted the Plan from a defined benefit to a defined contribution scheme
- 2 Whether the power of amendment was properly exercised
- 3 Effect of compromise agreements on members' rights
Ratio Decidendi
The 1992 Deed did not validly convert the Plan from a defined benefit to a defined contribution scheme in respect of accrued rights because the power of amendment was not properly exercised and did not permit the removal of accrued defined benefit entitlements. The compromise agreements did not operate to waive accrued defined benefit rights for members who did not give informed consent. Estoppel and contract arguments failed due to lack of clear representation or agreement by members to forgo accrued rights.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief granted; conversion invalid as to accrued rights; compromise agreements not effective to waive accrued rights without informed consent.
Orders
- Declaration that the 1992 Deed did not validly remove accrued defined benefit rights of members as at 1 January 1992.
- Declaration that compromise agreements do not preclude members from asserting accrued defined benefit rights unless informed consent is proven.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment