YM (a child ) v Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2006] EWHC 820 (QB) (12 April 2006)
The court held that, due to the specific arrangements and agreements made between the NHSLA, the Secretary of State, and the defendant Trusts—whereby the NHSLA is made the effective source of periodical payments and claimants have direct enforcement rights against the NHSLA—the statutory requirement for reasonable security of periodical payments is satisfied under section 2(4)(c) of the Damages Act 1996.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 820 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: YM (A child and patient by her Mother and Litigation Friend EH); First Defendant: Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Health; Claimant: Joseph Samuel Kanu (A Patient suing by his Father and Litigation Friend, Samuel Kanu); First Defendant: King's College Hospital Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Clinical Negligence Claim (personal Injury, Child/patient) / Settlement Approval and Order for Periodical Payments
- Outcome
- Settlements approved; orders for periodical payments made with NHSLA as source and responsible party.
- Legal Topics
- Periodical Payments, Damages for Personal Injury, Reasonable Security of Payments, NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts Liability, Enforcement of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YM (A child and patient by her Mother and Litigation Friend EH)
Claimant
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Health
Second Defendant
Joseph Samuel Kanu (A Patient suing by his Father and Litigation Friend, Samuel Kanu)
Claimant
King's College Hospital Trust
First Defendant
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence Claim (personal Injury, Child/patient) / Settlement Approval and Order for Periodical Payments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can be satisfied that continuity of periodical payments under the Damages Act 1996 is reasonably secure when the defendant is an NHS Foundation Trust or a Trust seeking Foundation status.
- 2 Whether the arrangements between NHSLA, the Secretary of State, and the Trusts provide sufficient security for periodical payments.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, due to the specific arrangements and agreements made between the NHSLA, the Secretary of State, and the defendant Trusts—whereby the NHSLA is made the effective source of periodical payments and claimants have direct enforcement rights against the NHSLA—the statutory requirement for reasonable security of periodical payments is satisfied under section 2(4)(c) of the Damages Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Settlements approved; orders for periodical payments made with NHSLA as source and responsible party.
Orders
- Defendants to make lump sum and periodical payments to claimants as set out in the approved orders.
- NHSLA to be responsible for and make periodical payments; claimants have direct enforcement rights against NHSLA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment