Homes for Haringey v Fari [2013] EWHC 757 (QB) (22 January 2013)

Homes for Haringey v Fari [2013] EWHC 757 (QB) (22 January 2013)

There is a strong prima facie case that Mr and Mrs Fari grossly exaggerated a personal injury claim and made false statements, justifying the grant of permission for committal proceedings in the public interest and as a proportionate response under the overriding objective.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 757
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Homes for Haringey; Defendant/appellant: Barbara Fari; Defendant/appellant: Piper Fari
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Bring Contempt of Court Proceedings / Permission Hearing Before High Court
Outcome
Permission granted for committal proceedings for contempt of court against Mr and Mrs Fari.
Legal Topics
Permission for Committal Proceedings, False Statements, Exaggeration of Claims, Procedural Defects, Public Interest in Administration of Justice
Civil Procedure Personal Injury Contempt of Court Permission for Committal Proceedings False Statements Exaggeration of Claims Procedural Defects Public Interest in Administration of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Homes for Haringey

Claimant/respondent

Barbara Fari

Defendant/appellant

Piper Fari

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Application for Permission to Bring Contempt of Court Proceedings / Permission Hearing Before High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a strong prima facie case of contempt against Mr and Mrs Fari
  2. 2 Whether public interest requires committal proceedings
  3. 3 Whether committal proceedings are proportionate and in accordance with the overriding objective

Ratio Decidendi

There is a strong prima facie case that Mr and Mrs Fari grossly exaggerated a personal injury claim and made false statements, justifying the grant of permission for committal proceedings in the public interest and as a proportionate response under the overriding objective.

Court Disposition

Permission granted for committal proceedings for contempt of court against Mr and Mrs Fari.

Orders

  • Permission for committal proceedings granted
  • Directions to be given for further conduct of proceedings