Hewes v Tanna & Ors [2018] EWHC 2528 (QB) (26 July 2018)
Permission to appeal is granted because there are powerful arguments that merit full consideration on appeal, particularly regarding the assessment and admissibility of expert evidence in summary judgment applications and the procedural fairness of the process followed below.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 2528 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Barry Hewes; Third Defendant: Dr Tanna
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Appeal, Summary Judgment, Expert Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry Hewes
Claimant
Dr Tanna
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted against summary judgment based on expert evidence
- 2 Appropriate approach to assessment of pre-emptively served expert reports in summary judgment applications
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because there are powerful arguments that merit full consideration on appeal, particularly regarding the assessment and admissibility of expert evidence in summary judgment applications and the procedural fairness of the process followed below.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal is granted; further directions to be determined by the appeal judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment