RB, R (On the Application Of) v The Family Court At Cardiff & Ors
The application disclosed no arguable case of jurisdictional error or procedural irregularity amounting to a denial of a fair hearing; the applicant had received a full and fair hearing before both DJ Regan and HHJ Parry, and the refusal to admit Dr Mirza's report was a proper exercise of discretion.
- Parties
- Claimant: RB; Defendants: The Family Court at Cardiff and Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Seek Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Appeal, Admission of Expert Evidence, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RB
Claimant
The Family Court at Cardiff and Ors
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Seek Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal to admit Dr Mirza's report amounted to procedural irregularity or denial of fair hearing
- 2 Whether the application for judicial review disclosed an arguable case of jurisdictional error or procedural unfairness
Ratio Decidendi
The application disclosed no arguable case of jurisdictional error or procedural irregularity amounting to a denial of a fair hearing; the applicant had received a full and fair hearing before both DJ Regan and HHJ Parry, and the refusal to admit Dr Mirza's report was a proper exercise of discretion.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment