Buike v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
On the evidence before the court, the claimant crossed the threshold of showing that it might properly be concluded that section 329(5) does not apply. Therefore, the claim is not barred at the permission stage and should proceed to trial.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Buike; Defendant/respondent: Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Bring Civil Proceedings for Assault
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; permission to bring proceedings granted
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Sue Police for Assault, Section 329 Criminal Justice Act 2003, Use of Force by Police, Summary Judgment Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Buike
Claimant/applicant
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Bring Civil Proceedings for Assault
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's application to bring proceedings for assault against the police is barred by section 329 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether there is a real prospect of showing that the police officer did not believe his actions were necessary under section 329(5)
- 3 Whether the officer's conduct was grossly disproportionate
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence before the court, the claimant crossed the threshold of showing that it might properly be concluded that section 329(5) does not apply. Therefore, the claim is not barred at the permission stage and should proceed to trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; permission to bring proceedings granted
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Claimant granted permission to bring proceedings for assault against the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment