O2(UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government
The Inspector erred in law by treating the development as a single development without enabling submissions on whether it should be regarded as two separate developments. The decision must be quashed and remitted for reconsideration.
- Parties
- Claimant: O2(UK) Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: London Borough of Islington
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Inspector's decision quashed and matter remitted to Secretary of State for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Permitted Development, Telecommunications Equipment, Prior Approval Procedure, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O2(UK) Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
London Borough of Islington
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cumulative volume of radio equipment housing should be considered for permitted development under GPDO Part 24, Class A, paragraph A.2(4)(b)
- 2 Whether the Inspector erred in law by treating the development as a single development without allowing submissions on separation
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector erred in law by treating the development as a single development without enabling submissions on whether it should be regarded as two separate developments. The decision must be quashed and remitted for reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Inspector's decision quashed and matter remitted to Secretary of State for reconsideration.
Orders
- Matter remitted to Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government for redetermination.
- Claimant awarded two-thirds of their costs payable by the Secretary of State.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment