O'Reilly v Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service [2001] EWCA Civ 2080 (20 December 2001)

O'Reilly v Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service [2001] EWCA Civ 2080 (20 December 2001)

The judge was entitled to accept the consistent medical evidence that the claimant suffered from PTSD causally linked to the 1995 accident, notwithstanding his return to work and apparent initial recovery, and the defendant's arguments did not disclose a real prospect of success on appeal.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 2080
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Garrett John O'Reilly; Defendant/applicant: Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Defendant's Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Applications for permission to appeal and for a stay of execution dismissed.
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Vicarious Liability, Psychiatric Injury, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (ptsd), Causation
Tort Law Employment Law Personal Injury Vicarious Liability Psychiatric Injury Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (ptsd) Causation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Garrett John O'Reilly

Claimant/respondent

Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Appeal / Defendant's Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Execution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's psychiatric injury (PTSD) was caused or materially contributed to by the accident for which the defendant was vicariously liable
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's return to work and apparent recovery precluded a finding of causation for later psychiatric illness

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to accept the consistent medical evidence that the claimant suffered from PTSD causally linked to the 1995 accident, notwithstanding his return to work and apparent initial recovery, and the defendant's arguments did not disclose a real prospect of success on appeal.

Court Disposition

Applications for permission to appeal and for a stay of execution dismissed.

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • Application for stay of execution refused