Chelfat v Chaudhry's Restaurant Ltd [2019] EWHC 2959 (QB) (05 November 2019)
The trial judge erred by allocating the claimant's injuries to the wrong bracket in the Judicial College Guidelines, resulting in an inadequate award of general damages, and misapplied the cap for litigant in person costs by reference to the amount claimed rather than the hypothetical legal representative's costs.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 2959 (QB)
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Zehour Chelfat; Respondent/defendant: Chaudhry's Restaurant Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal Against Assessment of Damages and Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order varied
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Costs for Litigant in Person, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zehour Chelfat
Appellant/claimant
Chaudhry's Restaurant Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal Against Assessment of Damages and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in the assessment of general damages for personal injury
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in the summary assessment of costs for a litigant in person
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred by allocating the claimant's injuries to the wrong bracket in the Judicial College Guidelines, resulting in an inadequate award of general damages, and misapplied the cap for litigant in person costs by reference to the amount claimed rather than the hypothetical legal representative's costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order varied
Orders
- General damages increased to £10,000 with £850 interest
- Past financial losses awarded at £100 with £8.50 interest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment