Jagger v Holland [2020] EWHC 1197 (QB) (12 May 2020)

Jagger v Holland [2020] EWHC 1197 (QB) (12 May 2020)

D3's costs should be assessed on the standard basis, not indemnity, due to the time-limited nature of the offer, D3's failure to comply with ADR directions, and the unsatisfactory nature of D3's evidence. Both D1 and D2 should pay D3's costs, but D2 should bear a higher proportion (60%) due to its role in joining D3...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] EWHC 1197
Parties
Claimant: Joanne Jagger; 1st Defendant: Austin Holland; 2nd Defendant: Cambridge Live Ltd; 3rd Defendant/third Party: Stanley Thurston (trading as S. C. Thurston & Sons)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2020
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/negligence / Post Trial, Costs Determination
Outcome
D3's costs to be paid on the standard basis by D1 and D2 in the proportions of 40% and 60% respectively. D1 to pay D2 £37,550 within 21 days for overpayment of interim sums.
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Negligence, Costs, Apportionment of Liability, Contributory Negligence
Tort Law Civil Procedure Personal Injury Negligence Costs Apportionment of Liability Contributory Negligence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joanne Jagger

Claimant

Austin Holland

1st Defendant

Cambridge Live Ltd

2nd Defendant

Stanley Thurston (trading as S. C. Thurston & Sons)

3rd Defendant/third Party

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury/negligence / Post Trial, Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether D3 is entitled to indemnity costs or standard costs
  2. 2 Which defendants should pay D3's costs and in what proportion
  3. 3 Whether D2 is entitled to reimbursement from D1 for overpayment of interim sums

Ratio Decidendi

D3's costs should be assessed on the standard basis, not indemnity, due to the time-limited nature of the offer, D3's failure to comply with ADR directions, and the unsatisfactory nature of D3's evidence. Both D1 and D2 should pay D3's costs, but D2 should bear a higher proportion (60%) due to its role in joining D3 and the nature of the claims pursued.

Court Disposition

D3's costs to be paid on the standard basis by D1 and D2 in the proportions of 40% and 60% respectively. D1 to pay D2 £37,550 within 21 days for overpayment of interim sums.

Orders

  • D3's costs assessed on the standard basis, paid 40% by D1 and 60% by D2.
  • D1 to pay D2 £37,550 within 21 days.