Catherine O’Boyle v Mary Vivien Wallis
A representative appointed under CPR 19.12 is not personally liable for costs incurred before appointment unless there is evidence of causation, acceptance of liability, or improper conduct. The court must exercise discretion and consider the particular circumstances. The Appellant is personally liable only for costs incurred after her appointment, assessed on the standard basis, and not for costs incurred prior to appointment or for the payment on account ordered by the Master.
- Parties
- Claimant / Appellant: Catherine O’Boyle (as representative of the estate of Paul O’Boyle, deceased); Defendant / Respondent: Mary Vivien Wallis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Personal Liability of Representatives, Costs Orders, CPR 19.12, Standing After Bankruptcy, Indemnity Vs Standard Costs, Extension of Time, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine O’Boyle (as representative of the estate of Paul O’Boyle, deceased)
Claimant / Appellant
Mary Vivien Wallis
Defendant / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a representative appointed under CPR 19.12 personally liable for costs incurred before appointment?
- 2 Does bankruptcy affect standing to appeal a costs order made against a representative?
- 3 Should costs be assessed on the indemnity or standard basis for the representative?
Ratio Decidendi
A representative appointed under CPR 19.12 is not personally liable for costs incurred before appointment unless there is evidence of causation, acceptance of liability, or improper conduct. The court must exercise discretion and consider the particular circumstances. The Appellant is personally liable only for costs incurred after her appointment, assessed on the standard basis, and not for costs incurred prior to appointment or for the payment on account ordered by the Master.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Appellant not personally liable for costs incurred prior to 14 March 2025.
- Appellant personally liable for costs incurred between 14 March 2025 and 18 July 2025, assessed on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment