Smith, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
It is rational and lawful for the Secretary of State to give less weight to Circular 01/2006 on the basis of an announced intention to revoke it, even before formal revocation. The reasons given for the decision were legally adequate, and paragraph 71 of PPS3 does not apply to Gypsy and Traveller site provision, which is governed by Circular 01/2006. Even if PPS3 applied, it would not alter the outcome.
- Parties
- Claimant: Julie Smith; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Doncaster Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Gypsy and Traveller Sites, Policy Weighting, Judicial Review, Reasons for Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julie Smith
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Doncaster Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State acted irrationally in giving less weight to Circular 01/2006 when it had not been revoked
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State provided legally adequate reasons for his decision
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State failed to consider or misunderstood the applicability of paragraph 71 of Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) Housing
Ratio Decidendi
It is rational and lawful for the Secretary of State to give less weight to Circular 01/2006 on the basis of an announced intention to revoke it, even before formal revocation. The reasons given for the decision were legally adequate, and paragraph 71 of PPS3 does not apply to Gypsy and Traveller site provision, which is governed by Circular 01/2006. Even if PPS3 applied, it would not alter the outcome.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed
- Claimant to pay the First Defendant's costs in the sum of £6,677
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment