Telecom Securicor v Cellular Radio Ltd & Anor [2000] EWHC 655 (Admin) (02 November 2000)

Telecom Securicor v Cellular Radio Ltd & Anor [2000] EWHC 655 (Admin) (02 November 2000)

The inspector erred in law by construing 'essential for operation' in Policy PU10 as requiring necessity for national licence compliance rather than operational need in the locality. This error was material and could have affected the outcome, requiring the decision to be quashed.

Citation
[2000] EWHC 655 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Limited (BT Cellnet); First Defendant: Brecon Beacons National Park Authority; Second Defendant: National Assembly for Wales
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (s.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment on Challenge to Planning Inspector's Decision
Outcome
Decision of the inspector quashed; matter to be reconsidered by a new inspector.
Legal Topics
Planning Permission, Telecommunications Infrastructure, National Park Protection, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review
Administrative Law Planning Law Planning Permission Telecommunications Infrastructure National Park Protection Statutory Interpretation Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Limited (BT Cellnet)

Claimant

Brecon Beacons National Park Authority

First Defendant

National Assembly for Wales

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (s.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment on Challenge to Planning Inspector's Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the inspector erred in law in interpreting Policy PU10 of the Local Plan
  2. 2 Whether the inspector's decision was vitiated by taking into account immaterial considerations or misdirecting himself as to the policy requirements

Ratio Decidendi

The inspector erred in law by construing 'essential for operation' in Policy PU10 as requiring necessity for national licence compliance rather than operational need in the locality. This error was material and could have affected the outcome, requiring the decision to be quashed.

Court Disposition

Decision of the inspector quashed; matter to be reconsidered by a new inspector.

Orders

  • Quashing order in respect of the inspector's decision dated 11 January 2000
  • First defendant to pay claimant's costs, summarily assessed at £10,000 within 28 days