Antler Homes Wessex Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2008] EWHC 951 (Admin) (16 April 2008)
The Inspector lawfully exercised planning judgment in refusing permission based on the intensity and character of the proposed development, and reliance on views from the footpath did not amount to procedural unfairness or error of law.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 951 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Antler Homes Wessex Limited; 1st Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; 2nd Defendant: East Hampshire District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Settlement Policy Boundary, Backland Development, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antler Homes Wessex Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
1st Defendant
East Hampshire District Council
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law by refusing planning permission for backland development within the Settlement Policy Boundary
- 2 Whether procedural unfairness occurred due to reliance on views from a public footpath
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector lawfully exercised planning judgment in refusing permission based on the intensity and character of the proposed development, and reliance on views from the footpath did not amount to procedural unfairness or error of law.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed
- Summary assessment of costs in favour of Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in the sum of £6,288
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment